top of page
Search

Exploring Physics and Mechanics Through STEM Kits

Science Kit: Physics & Mechanics | Chemistry | Biology & Life Science | Plants & Gardening | Animals & Ecosystems| Earth & Environmental Science

Build machines, test forces, and explore motion with hands-on physics kits that make STEM learning exciting.


Exploring Physics and Mechanics Through STEM Kits

Table of Contents

What are Physics & Mechanics Kits?


These STEM Kits focus on the principles of motion, force, energy, and simple machines. Learners engage with real-world physics concepts by constructing catapults, pulleys, levers, roller coasters, and even small wind turbines. Through these activities, they don’t just learn Newton’s Laws — they experience them in action.


For instance, when adjusting a catapult’s launch angle, students are applying projectile motion. When testing pulley systems, they explore mechanical advantage and energy transfer firsthand. This experiential approach helps bridge the gap between theory and real-world understanding.


Deepening Understanding Through Design and Experimentation


STEM Kits encourage iterative design: identifying problems, brainstorming, prototyping, testing, and refining. This mirrors real-world engineering and scientific processes, nurturing persistence and creative problem-solving.


Students might ask questions like:

  • “How can I make this lever lift a heavier object with less effort?”

  • “What design will make my marble roller coaster faster?”

  • “Which pulley system gives the greatest mechanical advantage?”


Hands-on, task-centered learning—especially when combined with robotics or programming—significantly improves students’ grasp of Newtonian mechanics, energy, and force, even outperforming traditional lectures [1, 4, 6].


Enhanced hands-on experimentation is particularly effective at correcting misconceptions and promoting conceptual change in topics like work and energy [8].


Integrating Technology, Math, and Modern Tools


Modern kits often incorporate technology, such as sensors, robotics, or 3D-printed components, allowing for data collection, modeling, and interdisciplinary learning [4, 5, 11]. The use of simulations, augmented reality, and multimedia further enhances conceptual understanding, especially when combined with physical experimentation [2, 3, 9]. These tools help visualize invisible processes, support inquiry-based learning, and make physics more accessible and enjoyable [2, 3].


Learning Outcomes


Through these activities, learners can:

  • Apply Newton’s Laws of Motion to predict and explain outcomes.

  • Demonstrate understanding of energy transfer and conservation.

  • Calculate mechanical advantage in levers, pulleys, and gears.

  • Design, test, and refine devices that illustrate physical principles.

  • Communicate findings effectively through reports or presentations.


Real-World Connections


The physics explored in these kits underpins countless real-world systems:

  • Amusement park rides rely on motion, momentum, and centripetal force.

  • Construction cranes and elevators use pulleys and levers.

  • Renewable energy devices apply torque, pressure, and energy conversion.


By connecting classroom learning to everyday experiences, students recognize that physics is not just about equations — it’s the foundation of how our world works.


Example Projects to Try



These simple yet powerful experiments ignite curiosity and build problem-solving confidence.


The Science of Learning: Why STEM Kits Work?


Constructivist and experiential learning theories support the use of kits: students build knowledge through active experience and reflection [4, 7, 10]. Research shows that guided discovery, deliberate practice, and combining hands-on construction with interactive feedback yield the greatest learning gains [2, 8, 12].


Physics and Mechanics Kits are gateways to discovery, fostering independence, critical thinking, and real-world problem-solving. By integrating hands-on experimentation with modern technology and design thinking, these kits help learners not just understand physics—but experience it in motion.


References

  1. Achilli, G., Logozzo, S., & Valigi, M. (2022). An Educational Test Rig for Kinesthetic Learning of Mechanisms for Underactuated Robotic Hands. Robotics, 11, 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics11050115.

  2. Altmeyer, K., Kapp, S., Thees, M., Malone, S., Kuhn, J., & Brünken, R. (2020). The use of augmented reality to foster conceptual knowledge acquisition in STEM laboratory courses - Theoretical background and empirical results. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 51, 611-628. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12900.

  3. Banda, H., & Nzabahimana, J. (2021). Effect of integrating physics education technology simulations on students’ conceptual understanding in physics: A review of literature. Physical Review Physics Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.17.023108.

  4. Chang, C., & Chen, Y. (2020). Using mastery learning theory to develop task-centered hands-on STEM learning of Arduino-based educational robotics: psychomotor performance and perception by a convergent parallel mixed method. Interactive Learning Environments, 30, 1677 - 1692. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1741400.

  5. Darmawansah, D., Hwang, G., Chen, M., & Liang, J. (2023). Trends and research foci of robotics-based STEM education: a systematic review from diverse angles based on the technology-based learning model. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00400-3.

  6. Ferrarelli, P., & Iocchi, L. (2021). Learning Newtonian Physics through Programming Robot Experiments. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26, 789 - 824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09508-3.

  7. Hubbard, K., Henri, D., Scott, G., Snelling, H., & Roediger, E. (2024). Developing undergraduate practical skills and independence with ‘at home practical kits’. International Journal of Science Education, 47, 65 - 86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2311087.

  8. Liu, G., & Fang, N. (2021). The effects of enhanced hands-on experimentation on correcting student misconceptions about work and energy in engineering mechanics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41, 462 - 481. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1909555.

  9. Nyirahabimana, P., Minani, E., Nduwingoma, M., & Kemeza, I. (2023). Assessing the impact of multimedia application on student conceptual understanding in Quantum Physics at the Rwanda College of Education. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11970-8.

  10. Ozkan, G., & Topsakal, U. (2020). Investigating the effectiveness of STEAM education on students’ conceptual understanding of force and energy topics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 39, 441 - 460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1769586.

  11. Usembayeva, I., Kurbanbekov, B., Ramankulov, S., Batyrbekova, A., Kelesbayev, K., & Akhanova, A. (2024). 3D Modeling and Printing in Physics Education: The Importance of STEM Technology for Interpreting Physics Concepts. Qubahan Academic Journal. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n3a727.

  12. Yannier, N., Hudson, S., & Koedinger, K. (2020). Active Learning is About More Than Hands-On: A Mixed-Reality AI System to Support STEM Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30, 74 - 96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00194-3.

Comments

bottom of page